, it call its a crisis and imply fist we spend $14 trillion, we can prevent a storm like sandy. it is implying we control the weather. at the same time twants to control the economy. it is as if the world economic forms looked at the stimulus and seeing, instead of a fiasco, it said, wow, how can we expand this globally, $700 billion to do internationally, what president obama did domestically. >> neil: this is not equally distributed. rich countries going to poorer countries and caldron and the impeccable record of losing trillions. that would be the same guy advocating on behalf of these countries that have a tough time getting money allotted. >> yeah. this is all under sort of the rubric of environmental justice. the idea is that the wealthy nations will redistribute to the >> >> neil: the money is diceet and money that is lost is pretty convincing. >> if you are worried about 1.5 billion that don't have running water, living in huts made of dung, the greatest threat they have is fossile fuel. so the idea of putting solar panels instead of real infrastructure and running wat